Prediction of Tuomas Ketola vs Zack Fleishman Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
T. Ketola vs Z. Fleishman

Tuomas Ketola
FIN
l
w
w
w
l
l
l
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
50
Age
45
6'1" (185 cm)
Height
6'2" (188 cm)
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
156
Best Rank
127
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$9.4K
Career Money
$100.3K
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed

Zack Fleishman
USA
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
50
Age
45
6'1" (185 cm)
Height
6'2" (188 cm)
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
156
Best Rank
127
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$9.4K
Career Money
$100.3K
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Ketola 1 - 0 Fleishman
They have played 3 sets in total, with Tuomas Ketola winning 2 and Zack Fleishman winning 1. The last match between Tuomas Ketola and Zack Fleishman was at the USTA Challenger of Burbank - Burbank, 29-10-2001, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Tuomas Ketola getting the victory 7-5 4-6 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ketola | 1 |
| Fleishman | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) USTA Challenger of Burbank - Burbank(10-29-01)
Tuomas Ketola
7
4
6
Zack Fleishman
5
6
2
T. Ketola vs Z. Fleishman H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $9,450 | Career Prize Money | $100,345 |
| 49.09% (216-224) | Career Total W/L | 51.99% (222-205) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 4 | Titles | 3 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
T. Ketola vs Z. Fleishman Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tuomas Ketola has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Zack Fleishman has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tuomas Ketola, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Zack Fleishman has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tuomas Ketola has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zack Fleishman has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tuomas Ketola has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Zack Fleishman winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tuomas Ketola has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 58% (W/L 36/26), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 35% (W/L 23/42). Zack Fleishman has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 58% (W/L 14/10), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 46% (W/L 21/25).
- Player level: In the last year, Tuomas Ketola has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Zack Fleishman has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Tuomas Ketola winning 1 times and Zack Fleishman being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Tuomas Ketola winning 2 and Zack Fleishman winning 1.
- The last match between Tuomas Ketola and Zack Fleishman was at the USTA Challenger of Burbank - Burbank, 29-10-2001, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Tuomas Ketola getting the victory 7-5 4-6 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tuomas Ketola has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Zack Fleishman has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tuomas Ketola has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zack Fleishman has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tuomas Ketola has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zack Fleishman has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Tuomas Ketola vs Zack Fleishman Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
T. Ketola vs Z. Fleishman H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 17 | Games Won | 13 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Ketola 0%, Fleishman 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Ketola 0%, Fleishman 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Ketola 0%, Fleishman 0%.
T. Ketola Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-1 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 7-5 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 6-7(6) 7-6(2) 3-0 ret. | ||
Rubber 5 | L | 7-6(5) 6-4 6-1 | ||
Rubber 1 | L | 3-6 6-4 6-1 3-6 8-6 | ||
Z. Fleishman Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 4-6 6-4 6-2 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-7(2) 6-2 6-2 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-2 3-1 ret. | ||
Q1 | L | 6-4 6-2 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-1 6-3 | ||

T. Ketola vs Z. Fleishman Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 49.09% (216/224) | YTD Win/Loss | 51.99% (222/205) |
| 48.87% (520/544) | Sets Win/Loss | 50.89% (513/495) |
| 49.89% (5177/5200) | Games Win/Loss | 50.47% (4898/4807) |
| 52.38% (88/80) | Hard Win/Loss | 52.61% (151/136) |
| 35.38% (23/42) | Clay Win/Loss | 45.65% (21/25) |
| 47.59% (69/76) | Indoor Hard W/L | 51.43% (36/34) |
| 58.06% (36/26) | Grass Win/Loss | 58.33% (14/10) |
| 0 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
| 25 | Aces Total | 209 |
| 0.01 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.03 |
| 26 | Total Double Faults | 136 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 438.29 | Average Opponent Rank | 486.71 |
| 50% (195/387) | 1st Serve % | 54% (1576/2919) |
| 66% (129/195) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (1092/1576) |
| 44% (91/208) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (662/1343) |
| 22% (10/46) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (91/214) |
| 37% (155/414) | Return Points Win % | 36% (998/2795) |
| 51.16% (22/21) | Slam W/L | 43.59% (17/22) |
| 42.86% (3/4) | Masters W/L | 28.57% (2/5) |
| 23.53% (4/13) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 47.73% (42/46) | Main Tour W/L | 53.16% (42/37) |
| 50.88% (145/140) | Challenger W/L | 51.36% (132/125) |
| 0% (0/0) | Futures W/L | 64.44% (29/16) |
| 50% (206/408) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (214/413) |
| 29% (8/28) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (4/8) |
| 46% (84/183) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (81/166) |
| 50% (76/152) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (80/149) |
| 77% (223/172) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (216/183) |
| 23% (223/51) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (216/32) |
| 20% (216/44) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (210/37) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
04:00 AM 15/11/25
Prediction01:30 AM 15/11/25
Prediction02:30 AM 15/11/25
Prediction11:00 AM 15/11/25
Prediction05:00 AM 15/11/25
Prediction07:00 AM 15/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips
14 Nov 2025
Rebecca Sramkova vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Alexander Zverev vs Felix Auger Aliassime Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Montevideo Challenger Preview And Prediction: Adolfo Daniel Vallejo vs Cristian Garin Betting Tips & Picks November 15, 2025
14 Nov 2025
Roman Andres Burruchaga vs Mariano Navone Prediction – ATP Montevideo Challenger – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Dan Added vs Jan-Lennard Struff Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Dan Added vs Jan-Lennard Struff Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
16:05
H2H 12-0
02:00
H2H 0-1
00:05
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
M15 Antalya
Turkey
M15 Heraklion
Greece
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico
M25 Monastir
Tunisia